Society for Technology in Anesthesia, 2009 Annual Meeting Abstract
Effects of Hypercapnic Hyperpnoea during Emergence on PACU Recovery
Dwayne Westenskow, Noah Syroid, Diane Tyler, Julia White, Frederike Bruehschwein, Cameron Jacobson, Sarah Beaty, Laurel Kay, Derek Sakata, Joseph Orr
INTRODUCTION: Hypercapnic hyperpnoea during emergence shortens the time between discontinuing the anesthetic to eye opening to command by an average of 62% after isoflurane and proportionately after sevoflurane and desflurane1,2. In the current study we measured the decrease in time to meet discharge criteria from the PACU.
METHODS: Written informed consent was obtained from 22 adult ASA class I-III patients undergoing eye surgery with desflurane. At the end of surgery patients were randomly assigned to a treatment or control group, the clinician turned off the vaporizer and increased the oxygen flow. In the experimental group a QED-100 was placed between the endotracheal tube and the anesthesia breathing circuit and minute ventilation was doubled (Anecare Inc., Salt Lake City, UT). In the control group minute ventilation was not changed. After tracheal extubation a second study nurse received the patient in the PACU. This study nurse and the other PACU nurses were unaware as to whether the patient was in the experimental or control group.
RESULTS: With hypercapnia and hyperpnoea patients responded and opened their eyes 4.1 + 1.4 min after turning off the desflurane vaporizer, whereas control patients responded after 6.5 + 2.3 min. The time until they stated their name and birth date was 10.9 + 5.1 min versus 18.2 + 9.7 min. Both differences were statistically significant. Figure 1 shows the time from the end of surgery until the PACU nurse found that patients met other discharge criteria. Hypercapnia and hyperpnoea with the QED-100 resulted in shorter times for each criterion but none of the others were statistically significantly when a modified Bonferroni correction was applied. Three of the QED-100 patient experienced mild nausea versus six control patients. Moderate nausea occurred in one QED patient and three control patients. Vomiting occurred in one control patient. The differences between groups were not statistically significant.
DISCUSSION: When the minute ventilation was doubled and PetCO2 was elevated to 48 mmHg rather than 35 mmHg during emergence, patients woke up 2.4 min faster. They were oriented sooner and could correctly state their full name, birth date and current year. An awake and oriented PACU patient may be at lower risk for airway obstruction and respiratory depression.3 Better predictability of recovery times can allow for better planning of recovery room discharge.